https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175971 Omission of the word "engaging" in a COFEPOSA detention order was treated as material because it narrowed the statutory purpose from habitual involvement in smuggling-related conduct, and the order was quashed. Inaccurate Marathi translations of the grounds of detention were also held fatal where terms used for "smuggled goods," "engaged," and "abetting" did not faithfully convey the English text, preventing an effective representation. The Marathi translation of the Section 9(1) declaration suffered the same defect because it failed to convey the crucial element of "engaged," reinforcing invalidity of the detention process and the detainee's right to a meaningful constitutional representation. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175971 Omission of the word "engaging" in a COFEPOSA detention order was treated as material because it narrowed the statutory purpose from habitual involvement in smuggling-related conduct, and the order was quashed. Inaccurate Marathi translations of the grounds of detention were also held fatal where terms used for "smuggled goods," "engaged," and "abetting" did not faithfully convey the English text, preventing an effective representation. The Marathi translation of the Section 9(1) declaration suffered the same defect because it failed to convey the crucial element of "engaged," reinforcing invalidity of the detention process and the detainee's right to a meaningful constitutional representation. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175971