https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175963 No limitation period could be imported into an application for possession under Section 43 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, because the Act itself prescribed none and the Limitation Act was inapplicable to such proceedings. The Court held that, absent any express provision making the Punjab Tenancy Act applicable, the limitation rule in Section 50 of that Act could not govern Pepsu Act applications. The dismissal of the possession application on limitation grounds was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the Collector for decision on the merits. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:37:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175963 No limitation period could be imported into an application for possession under Section 43 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, because the Act itself prescribed none and the Limitation Act was inapplicable to such proceedings. The Court held that, absent any express provision making the Punjab Tenancy Act applicable, the limitation rule in Section 50 of that Act could not govern Pepsu Act applications. The dismissal of the possession application on limitation grounds was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the Collector for decision on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175963