https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175957 The Court held that the differential treatment of category (i) employees was justified, but found no rational basis for discriminating between categories (ii) and (iii) regarding seniority fixation. The decisions of 1957 and 1961 were deemed unconstitutional and invalid for categories (ii) and (iii). The Court directed the Railway to restore the affected employees' seniority as per the 1952 decision. In a specific case, the respondent's seniority revision was invalidated, and the Railway was instructed to reestablish it according to the 1952 decision. The appeals were dismissed with costs, affirming the High Court's decision with exceptions. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175957 The Court held that the differential treatment of category (i) employees was justified, but found no rational basis for discriminating between categories (ii) and (iii) regarding seniority fixation. The decisions of 1957 and 1961 were deemed unconstitutional and invalid for categories (ii) and (iii). The Court directed the Railway to restore the affected employees' seniority as per the 1952 decision. In a specific case, the respondent's seniority revision was invalidated, and the Railway was instructed to reestablish it according to the 1952 decision. The appeals were dismissed with costs, affirming the High Court's decision with exceptions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175957