<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1348 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175954</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed by ITAT Delhi. The addition made under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified as there was no evidence of actual remission or cessation of liability. Additionally, the disallowance of the fee paid to ROC for increasing authorized share capital was upheld based on relevant case law and settled court rulings. The orders were pronounced on 28/01/2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 13:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1348 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175954</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed by ITAT Delhi. The addition made under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified as there was no evidence of actual remission or cessation of liability. Additionally, the disallowance of the fee paid to ROC for increasing authorized share capital was upheld based on relevant case law and settled court rulings. The orders were pronounced on 28/01/2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>