<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175951</link>
    <description>Section 128 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 conferred independent revisional power on both the State Government and the Registrar, and the prior order of the Additional Registrar did not exhaust the State Government&#039;s jurisdiction. The statutory scheme distinguished appeals from revisions, and the State Government had not delegated its revisional authority away. The revision was therefore maintainable and not vitiated for want of jurisdiction. On the service issue, Rule 244(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 authorised compulsory retirement in public interest after the prescribed service conditions were met; as the employee satisfied those conditions and the rule applied, the retirement order was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175951</link>
      <description>Section 128 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 conferred independent revisional power on both the State Government and the Registrar, and the prior order of the Additional Registrar did not exhaust the State Government&#039;s jurisdiction. The statutory scheme distinguished appeals from revisions, and the State Government had not delegated its revisional authority away. The revision was therefore maintainable and not vitiated for want of jurisdiction. On the service issue, Rule 244(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 authorised compulsory retirement in public interest after the prescribed service conditions were met; as the employee satisfied those conditions and the rule applied, the retirement order was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>