https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175946 Section 68, as amended, expressly permitted delegation of the Commissioner's functions under sections 105B to 105E of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, so the delegation of quasi-judicial powers was valid. The phrases "under the Commissioner's control" and "subject to his revision" were construed as limited to administrative supervision over the manner and working of the delegated function, and not as authority for the Commissioner to replace the delegate's independent decision on the merits. As the delegate's order operated as the Commissioner's order and was separately appealable, the impugned order was upheld and the challenge for want of jurisdiction failed. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:38:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175946 Section 68, as amended, expressly permitted delegation of the Commissioner's functions under sections 105B to 105E of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, so the delegation of quasi-judicial powers was valid. The phrases "under the Commissioner's control" and "subject to his revision" were construed as limited to administrative supervision over the manner and working of the delegated function, and not as authority for the Commissioner to replace the delegate's independent decision on the merits. As the delegate's order operated as the Commissioner's order and was separately appealable, the impugned order was upheld and the challenge for want of jurisdiction failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175946