<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175945</link>
    <description>A radio receiving set was treated as a &quot;telegraph&quot; because it receives communications by electricity within the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The expressions &quot;maintain&quot; and &quot;work&quot; were given a wide meaning and were held to cover keeping such a set in usable condition and operating it to receive communications. On that basis, possession and use of a radio set without a licence amounted to contravention of the statutory licensing regime and attracted liability under the Act. Using a radio receiving set without a licence was therefore an offence, and the conviction under that provision was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175945</link>
      <description>A radio receiving set was treated as a &quot;telegraph&quot; because it receives communications by electricity within the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The expressions &quot;maintain&quot; and &quot;work&quot; were given a wide meaning and were held to cover keeping such a set in usable condition and operating it to receive communications. On that basis, possession and use of a radio set without a licence amounted to contravention of the statutory licensing regime and attracted liability under the Act. Using a radio receiving set without a licence was therefore an offence, and the conviction under that provision was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>