<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 54 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1412</link>
    <description>The appellate court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude consideration for licensing &quot;know-how&quot; from the service tax demand. The remaining amount for consulting engineer services was confirmed as taxable. The case was remanded for quantifying liability, instructing to reduce the confirmed demand by the portion related to licensing rights. The judgment was pronounced on 26-12-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 54 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1412</link>
      <description>The appellate court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude consideration for licensing &quot;know-how&quot; from the service tax demand. The remaining amount for consulting engineer services was confirmed as taxable. The case was remanded for quantifying liability, instructing to reduce the confirmed demand by the portion related to licensing rights. The judgment was pronounced on 26-12-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>