<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 61 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the respondent&#039;s services were not classified as &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; and were not subject to new service tax provisions during the relevant period. Additionally, the services provided to election authorities were deemed non-commercial and not classified as business activities. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, finding no grounds for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 61 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the respondent&#039;s services were not classified as &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; and were not subject to new service tax provisions during the relevant period. Additionally, the services provided to election authorities were deemed non-commercial and not classified as business activities. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, finding no grounds for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>