https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175935 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's modified order directing the consideration of waitlisted candidates for appointment within a specified timeframe. The appellant's challenge based on the absence of a statutory provision for a waitlist was dismissed. The court emphasized compliance with the High Court's direction regarding unfilled vacancies, addressing issues such as the interpretation of recruitment rules, the panel life rule, discrepancies in the selection process, and the impact of earmarking vacancies for specific categories. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175935 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's modified order directing the consideration of waitlisted candidates for appointment within a specified timeframe. The appellant's challenge based on the absence of a statutory provision for a waitlist was dismissed. The court emphasized compliance with the High Court's direction regarding unfilled vacancies, addressing issues such as the interpretation of recruitment rules, the panel life rule, discrepancies in the selection process, and the impact of earmarking vacancies for specific categories. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175935