<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 458 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, disallowing the provision for wage arrears, allowing 60% depreciation on UPS, and dismissing the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. Section 115JB was held not applicable to banking companies. The treatment of brokerage paid for acquiring investments and loss on sale of investments were remitted for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed 60% depreciation on UPS in the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The appeals for the assessment year 2005-06 were dismissed for the assessee and partly allowed for the Revenue, while for 2006-07, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 458 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, disallowing the provision for wage arrears, allowing 60% depreciation on UPS, and dismissing the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. Section 115JB was held not applicable to banking companies. The treatment of brokerage paid for acquiring investments and loss on sale of investments were remitted for fresh consideration. The Tribunal allowed 60% depreciation on UPS in the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The appeals for the assessment year 2005-06 were dismissed for the assessee and partly allowed for the Revenue, while for 2006-07, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>