<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269149</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee did not conceal income or file inaccurate particulars. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified as the assessee&#039;s claim was bona fide and based on the legal framework existing at the time of filing the return. The order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty was upheld, and the grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed. The appeal of the Revenue was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:34:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269149</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee did not conceal income or file inaccurate particulars. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified as the assessee&#039;s claim was bona fide and based on the legal framework existing at the time of filing the return. The order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty was upheld, and the grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed. The appeal of the Revenue was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>