<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 443 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269139</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the CESTAT&#039;s decision to allow the respondent to pay a reduced penalty beyond the statutory 30-day period was legally unsustainable. The Court emphasized that the reduced penalty must be paid within 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, as per the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax was allowed, with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 443 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269139</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the CESTAT&#039;s decision to allow the respondent to pay a reduced penalty beyond the statutory 30-day period was legally unsustainable. The Court emphasized that the reduced penalty must be paid within 30 days from the communication of the adjudication order, as per the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax was allowed, with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>