<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a courier agency service provider, in a case involving service tax liability and the interpretation of Rule 3 of Export of Services Rules, 2005. The appellant&#039;s contention that their services constituted exports was upheld, as delivery abroad was deemed performance outside India. The Tribunal criticized the significant penalty imposed on the appellant, noting their genuine misunderstanding of the law. The decision was overturned, and the appellant was granted relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a courier agency service provider, in a case involving service tax liability and the interpretation of Rule 3 of Export of Services Rules, 2005. The appellant&#039;s contention that their services constituted exports was upheld, as delivery abroad was deemed performance outside India. The Tribunal criticized the significant penalty imposed on the appellant, noting their genuine misunderstanding of the law. The decision was overturned, and the appellant was granted relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>