<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269131</link>
    <description>Reimbursable expenses collected by the assessee were held not includible in the taxable value for service tax, as the issue was treated as covered by binding High Court decisions excluding such expenses from the service tax base. Following that settled position, the impugned order was not sustained and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269131</link>
      <description>Reimbursable expenses collected by the assessee were held not includible in the taxable value for service tax, as the issue was treated as covered by binding High Court decisions excluding such expenses from the service tax base. Following that settled position, the impugned order was not sustained and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>