<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 429 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269125</link>
    <description>Imported goods were found, on the Electronics Regional Test Laboratory report, to be compact fluorescent lamps originating from China and therefore liable to anti-dumping duty under the relevant notifications. The classification dispute was examined on that basis, and the appellate order was found to suffer from no irregularity because the Commissioner (Appeals) had already dealt with the issue and had granted relief by waiving fine and penalty. The challenge was rejected on merits, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 429 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269125</link>
      <description>Imported goods were found, on the Electronics Regional Test Laboratory report, to be compact fluorescent lamps originating from China and therefore liable to anti-dumping duty under the relevant notifications. The classification dispute was examined on that basis, and the appellate order was found to suffer from no irregularity because the Commissioner (Appeals) had already dealt with the issue and had granted relief by waiving fine and penalty. The challenge was rejected on merits, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>