<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 426 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269122</link>
    <description>Verification of the transaction and examination of possible tax liability under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act did not justify continued detention of a truck and goods where transport documents were available and the vehicle number discrepancy could be ? Need English only. continued detention of a truck and goods where transport documents were available and the vehicle number discrepancy required only factual verification. The HC held that such verification could be carried out in accordance with law without withholding release of the seized conveyance and goods, and the existence of doubt about the transaction did not by itself support continued seizure. Any tax liability could be examined independently, but the vehicle and goods had to be released immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 426 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269122</link>
      <description>Verification of the transaction and examination of possible tax liability under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act did not justify continued detention of a truck and goods where transport documents were available and the vehicle number discrepancy could be ? Need English only. continued detention of a truck and goods where transport documents were available and the vehicle number discrepancy required only factual verification. The HC held that such verification could be carried out in accordance with law without withholding release of the seized conveyance and goods, and the existence of doubt about the transaction did not by itself support continued seizure. Any tax liability could be examined independently, but the vehicle and goods had to be released immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>