<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269121</link>
    <description>Before resorting to best judgment assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax regime, the assessing authority must follow the prescribed sequence for defective or incomplete returns, serve proper notices, and give the dealer a meaningful opportunity to produce records, accounts and supporting documents. A composite notice that simultaneously calls for records and asks the dealer to show cause against best judgment assessment, without adequate compliance with the statutory procedure, is inconsistent with the Act, the Rules and fair hearing requirements. On that basis, the assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after hearing the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269121</link>
      <description>Before resorting to best judgment assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax regime, the assessing authority must follow the prescribed sequence for defective or incomplete returns, serve proper notices, and give the dealer a meaningful opportunity to produce records, accounts and supporting documents. A composite notice that simultaneously calls for records and asks the dealer to show cause against best judgment assessment, without adequate compliance with the statutory procedure, is inconsistent with the Act, the Rules and fair hearing requirements. On that basis, the assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after hearing the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>