<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (12) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175925</link>
    <description>A declaratory suit was held maintainable where no further effective relief was available against the defendants, so the proviso to Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 did not bar the claim. Certified copies of the memorandum and rules filed under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 were treated as prima facie evidence of registration, and the committee&#039;s minute authorised the named officers to institute proceedings, establishing locus standi. The court further recognised that a charitable dedication can arise without writing if the property is clearly set apart and divested, and held that the school buildings, lands, deposits, bonds and mortgage rights had been irrevocably dedicated to the school and vested in the committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (12) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175925</link>
      <description>A declaratory suit was held maintainable where no further effective relief was available against the defendants, so the proviso to Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 did not bar the claim. Certified copies of the memorandum and rules filed under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 were treated as prima facie evidence of registration, and the committee&#039;s minute authorised the named officers to institute proceedings, establishing locus standi. The court further recognised that a charitable dedication can arise without writing if the property is clearly set apart and divested, and held that the school buildings, lands, deposits, bonds and mortgage rights had been irrevocably dedicated to the school and vested in the committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>