<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 51 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that godown rent and staff salary should not be included in the calculation of service tax. The decision was based on the principle that expenses unrelated to the taxable services provided should not be subject to service tax, as established by relevant case law. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order and providing necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 51 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that godown rent and staff salary should not be included in the calculation of service tax. The decision was based on the principle that expenses unrelated to the taxable services provided should not be subject to service tax, as established by relevant case law. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order and providing necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>