<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175917</link>
    <description>In NDPS cases, proof of seizure and sealing will ordinarily sustain the prosecution where the core recovery evidence remains materially consistent and the seals are found intact. Minor omissions in witness testimony, delay in preparing the test memo, custody of the seal, dispatch of samples, or differences in sample weights will not by themselves create reasonable doubt unless specific tampering or prejudice is shown. Custody of the case property in sealed condition was accepted as compliant, and the conviction was not founded on the Section 67 statement. On these facts, the court held that the alleged procedural lapses did not vitiate the prosecution and the conviction and sentence were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175917</link>
      <description>In NDPS cases, proof of seizure and sealing will ordinarily sustain the prosecution where the core recovery evidence remains materially consistent and the seals are found intact. Minor omissions in witness testimony, delay in preparing the test memo, custody of the seal, dispatch of samples, or differences in sample weights will not by themselves create reasonable doubt unless specific tampering or prejudice is shown. Custody of the case property in sealed condition was accepted as compliant, and the conviction was not founded on the Section 67 statement. On these facts, the court held that the alleged procedural lapses did not vitiate the prosecution and the conviction and sentence were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>