https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175916 A later suit based on copyright complaints over drawings and moulds was treated as an abuse of process because the plaintiffs already knew those facts when they filed an earlier suit concerning the same toothbrushes. Applying the Code of Civil Procedure, the text states that a plaintiff must raise all available grounds arising from the same subject in dispute in the first proceeding to avoid repeated litigation. The later action was also described as barred by Order II, Rule 2 because it split claims from the same cause of action; the proper course was to seek amendment in the earlier pending suit. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:16:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175916 A later suit based on copyright complaints over drawings and moulds was treated as an abuse of process because the plaintiffs already knew those facts when they filed an earlier suit concerning the same toothbrushes. Applying the Code of Civil Procedure, the text states that a plaintiff must raise all available grounds arising from the same subject in dispute in the first proceeding to avoid repeated litigation. The later action was also described as barred by Order II, Rule 2 because it split claims from the same cause of action; the proper course was to seek amendment in the earlier pending suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175916