https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175910 A repealing and re-enacting evacuee property statute with a self-contained saving provision governed pending exchange applications, so an order of confirmation made after the 1950 Act commenced remained subject to revisional power under section 27. The Supreme Court also held that no vested right to finality arose merely on filing the application, because finality attached only when the order was actually made. While jurisdiction existed to revise the confirmation, the revisional order itself was found insufficiently reasoned and unclear in scope, so it was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:36:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175910 A repealing and re-enacting evacuee property statute with a self-contained saving provision governed pending exchange applications, so an order of confirmation made after the 1950 Act commenced remained subject to revisional power under section 27. The Supreme Court also held that no vested right to finality arose merely on filing the application, because finality attached only when the order was actually made. While jurisdiction existed to revise the confirmation, the revisional order itself was found insufficiently reasoned and unclear in scope, so it was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175910