https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175906 Rule 3 of the Hot Air Stenter Independent Textile Processors Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1998 had already been declared ultra vires Section 3A, and the Special Leave Petition against that ruling had been dismissed. On that binding position and the parties' joint submission, the Bombay HC held that no surviving cause of action remained in the Revenue's appeal. The Court therefore dismissed the appeal by consent, declined to answer the substantial questions of law framed at admission, and made no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:18:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175906 Rule 3 of the Hot Air Stenter Independent Textile Processors Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1998 had already been declared ultra vires Section 3A, and the Special Leave Petition against that ruling had been dismissed. On that binding position and the parties' joint submission, the Bombay HC held that no surviving cause of action remained in the Revenue's appeal. The Court therefore dismissed the appeal by consent, declined to answer the substantial questions of law framed at admission, and made no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175906