https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175902 Rule 4(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947 was construed as conferring an enforceable right on a gazetted government servant to have the case referred to the Tribunal on request. Reading the provision as merely discretionary would make it redundant beside Rule 4(1), which already vested discretion in the Governor for specified disciplinary matters. On that scheme, the word "may" in Rule 4(2) was treated as mandatory in effect, so the Governor is bound to make the reference when the servant seeks it. en-us Mon, 04 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:16:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175902 Rule 4(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947 was construed as conferring an enforceable right on a gazetted government servant to have the case referred to the Tribunal on request. Reading the provision as merely discretionary would make it redundant beside Rule 4(1), which already vested discretion in the Governor for specified disciplinary matters. On that scheme, the word "may" in Rule 4(2) was treated as mandatory in effect, so the Governor is bound to make the reference when the servant seeks it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175902