<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 56 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1399</link>
    <description>The appeal of the first appellant was remanded for decision on merits, while the appeals of the other two appellants were dismissed. The penalty for the second and third appellants was set aside by the lower appellate authority. Appeal No. CSM-156/04 was allowed for remand, and Appeal Nos. CSM 60-61/05 were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 56 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1399</link>
      <description>The appeal of the first appellant was remanded for decision on merits, while the appeals of the other two appellants were dismissed. The penalty for the second and third appellants was set aside by the lower appellate authority. Appeal No. CSM-156/04 was allowed for remand, and Appeal Nos. CSM 60-61/05 were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>