https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175894 A company in continued statutory possession of agricultural land after expiry of a lease was treated as a holder required to file a declaration under Section 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, because the tenancy scheme preserved juridical possession for agrarian reform purposes. On that basis, inquiry and vesting under Section 79-B(3) were held valid. The mistaken reference to Section 66 in the declaration did not defeat the proceedings, since the substance of the filing clearly attracted Section 79-B and the jurisdiction of the authorities was unaffected. The challenge to the vesting order therefore failed, and the State's action under the land reforms statute was upheld. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:43:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175894 A company in continued statutory possession of agricultural land after expiry of a lease was treated as a holder required to file a declaration under Section 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, because the tenancy scheme preserved juridical possession for agrarian reform purposes. On that basis, inquiry and vesting under Section 79-B(3) were held valid. The mistaken reference to Section 66 in the declaration did not defeat the proceedings, since the substance of the filing clearly attracted Section 79-B and the jurisdiction of the authorities was unaffected. The challenge to the vesting order therefore failed, and the State's action under the land reforms statute was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175894