https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175889 Promissory estoppel against an electricity corporation failed because the consumer did not specifically plead or prove a clear, unequivocal promise and consequential reliance. The tariff framework already contemplated surcharge on supply drawn from an independent feeder, and the exemption circular was later withdrawn. In the absence of foundational pleadings and supporting material showing that the consumer altered its position on the basis of the alleged assurance, the exemption could not be continued or restored on promissory estoppel grounds. en-us Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175889 Promissory estoppel against an electricity corporation failed because the consumer did not specifically plead or prove a clear, unequivocal promise and consequential reliance. The tariff framework already contemplated surcharge on supply drawn from an independent feeder, and the exemption circular was later withdrawn. In the absence of foundational pleadings and supporting material showing that the consumer altered its position on the basis of the alleged assurance, the exemption could not be continued or restored on promissory estoppel grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175889