https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175887 The High Court could not decline to examine the challenge to a revenue recovery certificate and the vires of Regulation 17(ii) merely by directing the appellant to pursue arbitration, because the constitutional challenge under Article 14 required judicial consideration on the merits. The Supreme Court held that the writ petition should not have been disposed of without addressing those substantive issues and that the matter required reconsideration by the High Court. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for fresh disposal. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175887 The High Court could not decline to examine the challenge to a revenue recovery certificate and the vires of Regulation 17(ii) merely by directing the appellant to pursue arbitration, because the constitutional challenge under Article 14 required judicial consideration on the merits. The Supreme Court held that the writ petition should not have been disposed of without addressing those substantive issues and that the matter required reconsideration by the High Court. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the writ petition was restored for fresh disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175887