<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 611 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175885</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision directing the petitioner to make a specific deposit towards duty within a stipulated timeframe. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding the use of power for non-mercerizing purposes, the Tribunal found evidence supporting duty liability. The petitioner&#039;s financial hardship plea was considered, but due to the substantial duty amount owed and prima facie evidence against the petitioner, the deposit order was upheld. The High Court allowed the appeal to be reviewed if a partial payment followed by the balance within a specified period was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 611 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175885</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision directing the petitioner to make a specific deposit towards duty within a stipulated timeframe. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding the use of power for non-mercerizing purposes, the Tribunal found evidence supporting duty liability. The petitioner&#039;s financial hardship plea was considered, but due to the substantial duty amount owed and prima facie evidence against the petitioner, the deposit order was upheld. The High Court allowed the appeal to be reviewed if a partial payment followed by the balance within a specified period was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>