https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269104 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and deeming them the rightful owner of the confiscated mobile phones. The confiscation was deemed unjustified as the appellant provided purchase bills and no other claimant emerged. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of investigation by the department and emphasized that the DGFT restrictions were not applicable in this case. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:23:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269104 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and deeming them the rightful owner of the confiscated mobile phones. The confiscation was deemed unjustified as the appellant provided purchase bills and no other claimant emerged. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of investigation by the department and emphasized that the DGFT restrictions were not applicable in this case. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269104