<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods but significantly reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 1 lakh, setting aside the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the reduction of the redemption fine and penalty was partially allowed, with the Tribunal considering the technical breach and the appellant&#039;s heavy demurrage costs. The decision was based on precedents where port restrictions led to reduced fines, granting the appellant any consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods but significantly reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 1 lakh, setting aside the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the reduction of the redemption fine and penalty was partially allowed, with the Tribunal considering the technical breach and the appellant&#039;s heavy demurrage costs. The decision was based on precedents where port restrictions led to reduced fines, granting the appellant any consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>