https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269093 The Tribunal upheld the FAA's decisions in the case, affirming that the rental income should be taxed under "income from house property" and allowing the interest expenditure. Expenses on improvement of leased premises and alleged bogus purchases were permitted, while additions on account of accommodation entries and proportionate interest expenses related to Juhu land were dismissed. The appeal filed by the AO was ultimately rejected on all grounds. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269093 The Tribunal upheld the FAA's decisions in the case, affirming that the rental income should be taxed under "income from house property" and allowing the interest expenditure. Expenses on improvement of leased premises and alleged bogus purchases were permitted, while additions on account of accommodation entries and proportionate interest expenses related to Juhu land were dismissed. The appeal filed by the AO was ultimately rejected on all grounds. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269093