<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 382 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269078</link>
    <description>Sale proceeds of shares recorded in the assessee&#039;s books could not be added as unexplained cash credit where the earlier share investment had already been accepted by the Revenue and the Assessing Officer relied mainly on Investigation Wing information without disproving the purchase or sale entries. Section 68 was held inapplicable on these facts, and taxing the same receipts again would amount to double addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 382 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269078</link>
      <description>Sale proceeds of shares recorded in the assessee&#039;s books could not be added as unexplained cash credit where the earlier share investment had already been accepted by the Revenue and the Assessing Officer relied mainly on Investigation Wing information without disproving the purchase or sale entries. Section 68 was held inapplicable on these facts, and taxing the same receipts again would amount to double addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>