<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269068</link>
    <description>Assessment and rectification orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act were unsustainable because they were passed without giving the dealer an opportunity to file objections or be heard. The rectification action under Section 84 was also taken without the statutory notice and opportunity required by the Act. This failure to follow the prescribed procedure breached natural justice and the orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269068</link>
      <description>Assessment and rectification orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act were unsustainable because they were passed without giving the dealer an opportunity to file objections or be heard. The rectification action under Section 84 was also taken without the statutory notice and opportunity required by the Act. This failure to follow the prescribed procedure breached natural justice and the orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>