<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 916 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal treated the classification and excisability of Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics as settled by existing precedent and declined to keep marketability open for future determination. The Karnataka HC found no basis to interfere with that view and accepted that the assessment order had been correctly affirmed. The challenge to the classification, excisability, and connected claim for exemption therefore failed, and the finding against the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 916 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal treated the classification and excisability of Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics as settled by existing precedent and declined to keep marketability open for future determination. The Karnataka HC found no basis to interfere with that view and accepted that the assessment order had been correctly affirmed. The challenge to the classification, excisability, and connected claim for exemption therefore failed, and the finding against the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>