<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1153 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175851</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was examined with reference to the statutory ingredients and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of penalty under the central excise framework. The Tribunal stated that, where the demand survives on the basis of the ingredients under Section 11A, there is no discretion to reduce the penalty. It nevertheless remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the penalty issue after granting a fair hearing, so that the penalty elements could be re-examined in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1153 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175851</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was examined with reference to the statutory ingredients and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of penalty under the central excise framework. The Tribunal stated that, where the demand survives on the basis of the ingredients under Section 11A, there is no discretion to reduce the penalty. It nevertheless remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the penalty issue after granting a fair hearing, so that the penalty elements could be re-examined in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>