https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175849 The appeals were dismissed, upholding the decision to waive penalties for the respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside penalties for failure to discharge service tax duty liability within the specified time, citing historical leniency towards new assessees and the rationale behind the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. The judgment referenced a similar case law precedent and aligned with the lenient approach towards penalties for procedural delays, ultimately supporting the decision to grant immunity from penal action to the service providers. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:27:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175849 The appeals were dismissed, upholding the decision to waive penalties for the respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside penalties for failure to discharge service tax duty liability within the specified time, citing historical leniency towards new assessees and the rationale behind the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. The judgment referenced a similar case law precedent and aligned with the lenient approach towards penalties for procedural delays, ultimately supporting the decision to grant immunity from penal action to the service providers. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175849