<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1289 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175842</link>
    <description>Service by affixture under Rule 58 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules was held impermissible unless the assessing authority first recorded satisfaction that the ordinary modes of service were impracticable. As the record showed no such satisfaction and did not establish proper service of the second show cause notice, the revisional action was found contrary to the prescribed service procedure and the requirement of a fair opportunity before adverse action. The revisional order was therefore invalid for breach of Rule 58 and natural justice and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1289 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175842</link>
      <description>Service by affixture under Rule 58 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules was held impermissible unless the assessing authority first recorded satisfaction that the ordinary modes of service were impracticable. As the record showed no such satisfaction and did not establish proper service of the second show cause notice, the revisional action was found contrary to the prescribed service procedure and the requirement of a fair opportunity before adverse action. The revisional order was therefore invalid for breach of Rule 58 and natural justice and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>