<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 360 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269056</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by remanding the quantification of the deduction under Section 80IB(10) back to the AO. The ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and maintained the disallowance of 30% of labor charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 23:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 360 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269056</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by remanding the quantification of the deduction under Section 80IB(10) back to the AO. The ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and maintained the disallowance of 30% of labor charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>