<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 355 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 14,16,946 made by the Assessing Officer and enhanced by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s explanation for the opening cash balance as of 01/04/1998, supported by evidence of substantial bank withdrawals during the previous financial year, was sufficient. Consequently, the Tribunal held that no part of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and enhanced by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:20:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 355 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 14,16,946 made by the Assessing Officer and enhanced by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s explanation for the opening cash balance as of 01/04/1998, supported by evidence of substantial bank withdrawals during the previous financial year, was sufficient. Consequently, the Tribunal held that no part of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and enhanced by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>