https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269034 The appeal before the CESTAT CHENNAI was dismissed on limitation grounds as the appellants failed to seek condonation of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Appellate Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269034 The appeal before the CESTAT CHENNAI was dismissed on limitation grounds as the appellants failed to seek condonation of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Appellate Tribunal found sufficient cause for the delay and remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269034