<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 336 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269032</link>
    <description>The tribunal exempted the appellant from penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the cooperative attitude and absence of malafides. The appellant was penalized with a fine of &amp;amp;8377; 5,000 for delay in seeking registration but was granted immunity from penalty for the delay in depositing service tax under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s cooperation with Revenue and lack of intention to evade taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 336 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269032</link>
      <description>The tribunal exempted the appellant from penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the cooperative attitude and absence of malafides. The appellant was penalized with a fine of &amp;amp;8377; 5,000 for delay in seeking registration but was granted immunity from penalty for the delay in depositing service tax under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s cooperation with Revenue and lack of intention to evade taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>