<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 328 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269024</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty for the short payment of Service Tax, deeming the errors inadvertent. However, penalties were upheld for the excess availing of Cenvat credit due to lack of separate accounts, limiting them to 25% of the Service Tax amount. The appellant&#039;s rectification before the show cause notice led to a reduced penalty, with the tribunal emphasizing the necessity of the audit in detecting discrepancies. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 328 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269024</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty for the short payment of Service Tax, deeming the errors inadvertent. However, penalties were upheld for the excess availing of Cenvat credit due to lack of separate accounts, limiting them to 25% of the Service Tax amount. The appellant&#039;s rectification before the show cause notice led to a reduced penalty, with the tribunal emphasizing the necessity of the audit in detecting discrepancies. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>