<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 324 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not prohibit maintaining separate accounts for inputs and a common cenvatable account for input services. As long as separate accounts for inputs are kept and the proportionate credit for input services is reversed, Rule 6(3) does not apply. The Tribunal remanded the matter to verify the appellant&#039;s claim of reversal of Cenvat credit for input services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 324 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not prohibit maintaining separate accounts for inputs and a common cenvatable account for input services. As long as separate accounts for inputs are kept and the proportionate credit for input services is reversed, Rule 6(3) does not apply. The Tribunal remanded the matter to verify the appellant&#039;s claim of reversal of Cenvat credit for input services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>