<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 312 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakhs imposed on M/s. Almas Impex under Section 114AA of the Customs Act for using false documents to obtain benefits under the VKUY scheme. Despite the appellant surrendering the scrips and paying the penalty, the Tribunal deemed the penalty justified due to the seriousness of the forgery. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not personally responsible was rejected, emphasizing the need for a deterrent penalty in cases of deliberate forgery involving false documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 312 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakhs imposed on M/s. Almas Impex under Section 114AA of the Customs Act for using false documents to obtain benefits under the VKUY scheme. Despite the appellant surrendering the scrips and paying the penalty, the Tribunal deemed the penalty justified due to the seriousness of the forgery. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not personally responsible was rejected, emphasizing the need for a deterrent penalty in cases of deliberate forgery involving false documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>