<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175829</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere where the petitioner had itself furnished interest, and dismissed the special leave petition. The order reflects no adjudication on the substantive customs or DGFT dispute; the result turned on the Court&#039;s refusal to exercise discretionary interference in light of the petitioner&#039;s own conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 17:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175829</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere where the petitioner had itself furnished interest, and dismissed the special leave petition. The order reflects no adjudication on the substantive customs or DGFT dispute; the result turned on the Court&#039;s refusal to exercise discretionary interference in light of the petitioner&#039;s own conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>