<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 900 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175821</link>
    <description>Delay in filing and re-filing a criminal revision petition under Section 5 is to be assessed on whether sufficient cause is shown, construed liberally in favour of substantial justice. The Court applied a pragmatic, justice-oriented approach and held that a plausible explanation for the delay should not be rejected on a technical or pedantic view. As the explanation on record was found acceptable and no deliberate inaction or mala fides was established, the refusal to condone delay was set aside. The revision was remitted to the High Court for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 900 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175821</link>
      <description>Delay in filing and re-filing a criminal revision petition under Section 5 is to be assessed on whether sufficient cause is shown, construed liberally in favour of substantial justice. The Court applied a pragmatic, justice-oriented approach and held that a plausible explanation for the delay should not be rejected on a technical or pedantic view. As the explanation on record was found acceptable and no deliberate inaction or mala fides was established, the refusal to condone delay was set aside. The revision was remitted to the High Court for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>