<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175818</link>
    <description>The High Court should ordinarily afford counsel an opportunity before deciding a pending second appeal on merits, and a party should not usually suffer for the default of counsel. As the appellants&#039; side was not heard when the appeal was taken up for final hearing, the Supreme Court found the dismissal of the second appeal and rejection of the recall application unsustainable. It set aside both orders and remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing the parties in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175818</link>
      <description>The High Court should ordinarily afford counsel an opportunity before deciding a pending second appeal on merits, and a party should not usually suffer for the default of counsel. As the appellants&#039; side was not heard when the appeal was taken up for final hearing, the Supreme Court found the dismissal of the second appeal and rejection of the recall application unsustainable. It set aside both orders and remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing the parties in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>