<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 53 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175816</link>
    <description>The definition of &quot;industry&quot; under the Act was construed broadly to cover organised municipal activities viewed from the standpoint of employer and employee, and not confined to trade or business. Municipal services that could also be performed by private persons for remuneration were held capable of falling within the term. The doctrine of noscitur a sociis could not narrow the statutory language. Primary and inalienable sovereign functions of the State, however, remained excluded. For departments performing mixed functions, the predominant activity controlled their legal character, and connected administrative or financial wings followed that main activity. On this basis, the relevant municipal departments were treated as industries, subject to exclusion of regal functions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 15:59:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 53 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175816</link>
      <description>The definition of &quot;industry&quot; under the Act was construed broadly to cover organised municipal activities viewed from the standpoint of employer and employee, and not confined to trade or business. Municipal services that could also be performed by private persons for remuneration were held capable of falling within the term. The doctrine of noscitur a sociis could not narrow the statutory language. Primary and inalienable sovereign functions of the State, however, remained excluded. For departments performing mixed functions, the predominant activity controlled their legal character, and connected administrative or financial wings followed that main activity. On this basis, the relevant municipal departments were treated as industries, subject to exclusion of regal functions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>